Compare Wallabyup With Other Search Engines

This page compares Wallabyup with DuckDuckGo, Bing and Google.

Search Engine Comparison

	Wallabyup	DuckDuckGo	Bing	Google
Less focus on social weighting
No filter bubble - other search engines let the users sex/politics/religion/etc. shape their front page (sheeple)
Ease of use. Wallabyup's direct match is harder when the query is vague as other search engines use artificial intelligent (AI) injected synonyms and heavy social media weighting
Searching Au gets Au - Other search engines fill results with foreign content
Advertising* model	Static or keyword ads maybe in future	Keyword ads	Behavioural ads	Behavioural ads
Wildcards allowed in searches
link: searches - who links to X website
site: searches - e.g. only match government sites
Show 1 result per domain or all results option
Date range
Show outlinks option (who a website links to)
Show backlinks option (who links to a website)
If quotes used, page must contain quote		No, injects substitute	No, injects substitute	No, injects substitute
If a minus search is used, page must not contain the minus word		No, injects substitute	No, injects substitute	No, injects substitute
Can copy search query via URL and share
Open page ranking/points system
Search control (direct match is more accurate when accuracy is required)
1 click search host or search without host (link anchor in each search result)
HTTPS (SSL) - padlock icon on browser
* Advertising note: There is a preferred hierarchy in advertising models with 3 levels; 1) Static Ads (best) where ads are shown to all searchers ignoring what query is typed in (Wallabyup / least manipulative), 2) Keyword Ads where the query you type in contains keywords which are matched with an ad theme (DuckDuckGo / industries and movements can shape your attention), 3) Behavioural Ads (worst) where everybody is tracked and analysed by artificial intelligence and social engineers and shown an ad (Google / you are followed, tracked and heavily targeted with specific ads).